Find a show you like and click the
button. The show will be added to your My Playlist page and updated 24/7 with new videos.
Search Results
0 Views
02:01:26 05/25/12
Myth McConnell
[LESS INFO] 0 VIEWS | ADDED 02:01:26 05/25/12
In the wake of the debt-ceiling crisis he helped manufacture last summer, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell boasted it was "a hostage that's worth ransoming" which "also is a new template" for the future. As it turns out, those threats were among the few true words McConnell has uttered. Because while he's promising once again to blackmail the White House over the debt ceiling, the Kentucky Republican claimed it's because "we'd like to do something about the nation's biggest problem, spending and debt, which of course is the reason for this economic malaise." Of course, as the data show, it's the very austerity policies here and in Europe which are costing jobs and hurting growth.
But Mitch McConnell's myth-making hardly ends there. On the economy, taxes, deficits, health care and so much else, virtually all of McConnell's talking points are tried - and untrue.
( Click a link to jump to the details for each below ):
* "Obama Made the Economy Worse"
* "No Evidence Whatsoever That the Bush Tax Cuts Actually Diminished Revenue"
* "Punishing Job Creators"
* "We Look a Lot Like Greece Already"
* Public Sector Layoffs Are a "Local" Problem
* 47 Million Uninsured Americans "Don't Go Without Health Care"
* The Public Option "May Cost You Your Life"
* Democrats Are "Sticking It to Seniors with Cuts to Medicare"
"Obama Made the Economy Worse"
For months, Mitch McConnell (for example, here , here and here ) regurgitated the GOP talking point that President Obama " made the economy worse ." Sadly for the trickle-down mythmakers of the Republican Party , the facts and the overwhelming consensus of economists - including John McCain's 2008 brain trust - prove otherwise. President Obama not only did not make the American economy worse; no thanks to obstructionist Republicans in Congress he saved the United States from "Great Depression 2.0" and put the nation on the path to recovery.
Start, for example, with the conclusions of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO). Despite Republican mythmaking that the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) "created zero jobs," in November the CBO reported that the stimulus added up to 2.4 million jobs and boosted GDP by as much as 1.9 points in the previous quarter. As The Hill explained, the CBO has found that "President Obama's 2009 stimulus package continues to benefit the struggling economy": >
The agency said the measure raised gross domestic product by between 0.3 and 1.9 percent in the third quarter of 2011, which ended Sept. 30. The Commerce Department said Tuesday that GDP in that quarter was only 2 percent total...
By CBO's numbers, the $800 billion stimulus added up to 0.9 million jobs in 2009, 3.3 million jobs in 2010 and 2.6 million jobs in 2011.
Mark Zandi , an adviser to John McCain in 2008, was adamant on positive role of the stimulus. Federal intervention, he and Princeton economist Alan Blinder argued in August 2010, literally saved the United States from a second Great Depression. In " How the Great Recession Was Brought to an End ," Blinder and Zandi's models confirmed the impact of the Obama recovery program and other federal interventions dating back to 2008, concluding that "laissez faire was not an option": >
We find that its effects on real GDP, jobs, and inflation are huge, and probably averted what could have been called Great Depression 2.0. For example, we estimate that, without the government's response, GDP in 2010 would be about 11.5% lower, payroll employment would be less by some 8½ million jobs, and the nation would now be experiencing deflation.
"No Evidence Whatsoever That the Bush Tax Cuts Actually Diminished Revenue"
In his version of the Republican myth that " tax cuts pay for themselves ," President Bush confidently proclaimed, "You cut taxes and the tax revenues increase." As it turned out, not so much.
After Ronald Reagan tripled the national debt with his supply-side tax cuts, George W. Bush doubled it again with his own. (Reagan's performance would have been much worse, had he not raised taxes 11 times to help make up the shocking shortfall.) As a share of American GDP, tax revenues peaked in 2000; that is, before the Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003. As the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities concluded, the Bush tax cuts accounted for half of the deficits during his tenure, and if made permanent , over the next decade would cost the U.S. Treasury more than Iraq, Afghanistan, the recession, TARP and the stimulus - combined .
Nevertheless, as the Republican Party waged its all-out attack in 2010 to preserve the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy , the GOP's number two man in the Senate provided the talking point to help sell the $70 billion annual giveaway to America's rich. "You should never," Arizona's Jon Kyl declared, "have to offset the cost of a deliberate decision to reduce tax rates on Americans." For his part, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell rushed to defend Kyl's fuzzy math: >
"There's no evidence whatsoever that the Bush tax cuts actually diminished revenue. They increased revenue because of the vibrancy of these tax cuts in the economy. So I think what Senator Kyl was expressing was the view of virtually every Republican on that subject."
That may have been a view universally shared by virtually every Republican, but it happens to be wrong.
"Punishing Job Creators"
For years, Senator McConnell has been among the legions of Republicans wrongly arguing that even the slightest increase in taxes for the wealthiest Americans is tantamount to " punishing job creators ." As his colleague John Boehner put it: >
"The top one percent of wage earners in the United States...pay forty percent of the income taxes...The people he's [President Obama] is talking about taxing are the very people that we expect to reinvest in our economy."
If so, those expectations were sadly unmet under George W. Bush. After all, the last time the top tax rate was 39.6 percent during the Clinton administration , the United States enjoyed rising incomes, 23 million new jobs and budget surpluses. Under Bush? Not so much.
On January 9, 2009, the Republican-friendly Wall Street Journal summed it up with an article titled simply, " Bush on Jobs: the Worst Track Record on Record ." (The Journal's interactive table quantifies his staggering failure relative to every post-World War II president.) The meager one million jobs created under President Bush didn't merely pale in comparison to the 23 million produced during Bill Clinton's tenure. In September 2009, the Congressional Joint Economic Committee charted Bush's job creation disaster, the worst since Hoover.
That dismal performance prompted David Leonhardt of the New York Times to ask last fall, "Why should we believe that extending the Bush tax cuts will provide a big lift to growth?" His answer was unambiguous: >
Those tax cuts passed in 2001 amid big promises about what they would do for the economy. What followed? The decade with the slowest average annual growth since World War II. Amazingly, that statement is true even if you forget about the Great Recession and simply look at 2001-7... >
Is there good evidence the tax cuts persuaded more people to join the work force (because they would be able to keep more of their income)? Not really. The labor-force participation rate fell in the years after 2001 and has never again approached its record in the year 2000. >
Is there evidence that the tax cuts led to a lot of entrepreneurship and innovation? Again, no. The rate at which start-up businesses created jobs fell during the past decade.
The data are clear: lower taxes for America's so called job-creators don't mean either faster economic growth or more jobs for Americans .
As Jared Bernstein aptly put it earlier this month: >
"Tax cuts and job growth? They're just not that into each other."
"We Look a Lot Like Greece Already"
As their last round of hostage-taking of the debt heated up last summer, Republicans including Mitch McConnell warned, "We look a lot like Greece."
hile FactCheck.org was quick to conclude that "whatever it 'looks like' through Sen. McConnell's eyes -- the fact is that the U.S. is not yet a fiscal wreck of Greek proportions," its analysis hardly does justice to the scale of the Republican myth-making. The Washington Monthly's Steve Benen summed it up quite succinctly: >
New rule: every time a confused Republican lawmakers compare the United States' fiscal conditions to that of Greece, an angel loses its wings.
Look, the very idea is just crazy. The U.S. has extremely low interest rates and foreign investor are happy to loan us money; Greece has extremely high interest rates and no one is eager to loan the country money. The U.S. has our own currency; Greece has the Euro. We have a great credit rating (for now); Greece has an awful credit rating. We have a manageable debt; Greece has a debt crisis. We're a large country with an enormous economy; Greece is a small country with a small economy. We have one of the world's most stable systems of government (at least until six months ago); Greece's government structure is a little shaky.
For his part, Nobel Prize-winning economist and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman has been decrying the " Hellenization of economic discourse " for months. "Greece -- with a long history of fiscal irresponsibility, very high public debt, and a country without a currency -- doesn't bear much resemblance even to the other peripheral Europeans, let alone the United States."
>
Here's debt levels (if you ask me the IMF projections for Greece are too optimistic). >
Plus there's the having your own currency thing, and the fact that the interest rate on US 10-year bonds is 3.11 percent, on Greek bonds 16.82 percent. >
Otherwise we're exactly the same.
Public Sector Layoffs a "Local" Problem
Last fall, Minority Leader McConnell led the GOP opposition to President Obama's proposed $400 billion American Jobs Act. The loss of hundreds of thousands of police, firefighter, teacher and other public sector jobs, he insisted, was a "local" problem.
As it turns out, the 600,000 state and local government jobs already lost since December 2008 is very much a national issue. That " anti-stimulus ," it turns out, has added a full point to America's unemployment rate .
Last month, the Economic Policy Institute noted that the private sector had gained 2.8 million jobs while federal, state and local governments shed 584,000 just since June 2009. EPI concluded that the public sector job losses constituted "an unprecedented drag on the recovery": >
"The current recovery is the only one that has seen public-sector losses over its first 31 months."
Back in March, Paul Krugman expressed the same point , but with some inconvenient historical context for the Party of Reagan. "In fact, if it weren't for this destructive fiscal austerity," Krugman explained, "Our unemployment rate would almost certainly be lower now than it was at a comparable stage of the 'Morning in America' recovery during the Reagan era." >
We're talking big numbers here. If government employment under Mr. Obama had grown at Reagan-era rates, 1.3 million more Americans would be working as schoolteachers, firefighters, police officers, etc., than are currently employed in such jobs. >
And once you take the effects of public spending on private employment into account, a rough estimate is that the unemployment rate would be 1.5 percentage points lower than it is, or below 7 percent -- significantly better than the Reagan economy at this stage.
47 Million Uninsured Americans "Don't Go Without Health Care"
McConnell the " strict obstructionist " was naturally in the forefront of the all-out Republican effort to block health care reform at any cost. As he repeatedly put it in June 2009 , "all of us want reform, but not reform that denies, delays, or rations health care." To prove his point, McConnell didn't merely trot out a Canadian patient who came to the U.S. for special treatment, but insisted to NBC's David Gregory that no American does without health care now. >
GREGORY: Do you think it's a moral issue that 47 million Americans go without health insurance? >
McCONNELL: Well, they don't go without health care. It's not the most efficient way to provide it. As we know, the doctors in the hospitals are sworn to provide health care. We all agree it is not the most efficient way to provide health care to find somebody only in the emergency room and then pass those costs on to those who are paying for insurance. So it is important, I think, to reduce the number of uninsured. The question is, what is the best way to do that?
That President George W. Bush, Tom Delay and Paul Broun among other Republicans also claimed "people have access to health care in America...after all, you just go to an emergency room" doesn't make it any more true. As the numbers show -- 50 million uninsured, another 25 million uninsured, 45,000 unnecessary deaths, one in five Americans "self-rationing" care and 62 percent of all personal bankruptcies being related to medical bills -- the crisis is far worse than the one Mitch McConnell pretends doesn't exist.
The Public Option "May Cost You Your Life"
While Mitch McConnell insisted that the lack of insurance doesn't prevent anyone from getting health care, in 2009 he suggested having coverage could prove fatal . Months before the passage of the Affordable Care Act without the so-called "public option," Minority Leader McConnell said it would be deadly.
That irresponsible fear-mongering came during an appearance on Dennis Miller's radio show in October 2009. Blasting the "opt-out" version of the public option then being considered in the Senate bill, the Senator from the state ranked 45th in health care performance insisted access to coverage could kill you : >
MCCONNELL: Well, it doesn't make any difference frankly whether you opt-in or you opt-out, it's still a government plan. You know, Medicaid, the program for the poor now, states can opt-out of that, but none of them have. I think if you have any kind of government insurance program, you're going to be stuck with it and it will lead us in the direction of the European style, you know, sort of British-style, single payer, government run system. And those systems are known for delays, denial of care and, you know, if your particular malady doesn't fit the government regulation, you don't get the medication. >
MILLER: Right. >
MCCONNELL: And it may cost you your life. I mean, we don't want to go down that path.
As a Harvard Medical School study found, each year the path of no health insurance leads 45,000 Americans to the grave.
Democrats Are "Sticking It to Seniors with Cuts to Medicare"
For two years running, Mitch McConnell has been among the 40 GOP Senator voting for Paul Ryan's House budget plan to privatize and inevitably ration Medicare now used by 46 million American seniors. In the late 1990's, McConnell joined in Newt Gingrich's effort to slash almost 15 percent from the Medicare budget so that the program would "wither on the vine." But when the Affordable Care Act called for savings from the private Medicare Advantage program used by only 15 percent of elderly beneficiaries, it was Mitch McConnell who warned seniors about the mythical danger.
In July 2009, McConnell tried to scare America's 46 million Medicare beneficiaries by declaring, "The administration plans to use Medicare cuts to fund yet another new government program." Hoping to build on the momentum of the GOP's disgusting and demonstrably false " euthanasia " talking point, McConnell cautioned: >
"Some in Congress seem to be in such a rush to pass just any reform, rather than the right reform, that they're looking everywhere for the money to pay for it -- even if it means sticking it to seniors with cuts to Medicare."
That salvo comes just two weeks after McConnell promised to defeat health care reform in the Senate, warning America's highest turnout voting block: >
"They are going to pay for this plan by cutting Medicare, that is cutting seniors."
Those claims, the New York Times pointed out the day after the Republicans' overwhelming triumph in the 2010 midterms elections were misleading at best and false at worst. But, sadly, they worked .
And so it goes.
As Joshua Green documented last year in the Atlantic , "Mitch McConnell is a master manipulator and strategist" whose "relentless tactics have made his party victorious." But that doesn't make him a truth-teller, except on those rare occasions when he reveals his true motivations. During the debt ceiling stand-off last summer , McConnell briefly got weak in the knees at the prospect of U.S. sovereign default not because it would be a disaster for the nation, but because it could damage his Republican Party : >
"I refuse to help Barack Obama get re-elected by marching Republicans into a position where we have co-ownership of a bad economy. ... If we go into default, he will say that Republicans are making the economy worse and try to convince the public -- maybe with some merit, if people stop getting their Social Security checks and military families start getting letters saying service people overseas don't get paid. It's an argument he could have a good chance of winning, and all of the sudden we have co-ownership of a bad economy," he said. "That is very bad positioning going into an election."
Especially an election which marks the culmination of Mitch McConnell's work over the past three and a half years: >
"The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president."
(This piece also appears at Perrspectives .)
0 Views
01:38:41 05/10/12
AppAdvice Daily: Appisode 550
[LESS INFO] 0 VIEWS | ADDED 01:38:41 05/10/12
Games can keep you occupied when you're alone, but the best games are played with friends. Today we are featuring some of our favorite take your turn and wait kind of games, also known as asynchronous games. All the big hitters are there. What are some of your favorites? Let us know in the comments.
0 Views
00:59:15 05/01/12
New Releases For May 1, 2012 - Press Pause Daily
[LESS INFO] 0 VIEWS | ADDED 00:59:15 05/01/12
This week’s new releases brings another fantasy MMO, some snipeage, a fatality, and some new downloadables.
SHOW NOTES:
GAME 1: Tera Online - PC
*Tera is a subscription-based* fantasy MMO (Massively Multiplayer Online) game for play on the PC that blends traditional MMO RPG elements with Action combat like no game before it.
*In the persistent game world of Tera, players can work alone or form groups and join guilds, but regardless of the approach, players must fully control their characters using the game's dynamic battle system in order to succeed.
*Additional features include: a customizable user interface, seven races with access to eight character classes, engaging PvP combat, and a three-continent wide game play area to explore.
At the end of the day, it’s just ANOTHER online MMO. It’s gonna have to bring something PRETTY interesting to tear gamers away from WoW.
GAME 2: Sniper Elite V2- PS3, Xbox 360, PC
Next we have Sniper Elite VS, the sequel to 2005's Sniper Elite.
*Sniper Elite V2 plunges you into war-torn Berlin during the final frenzied battle between German and Russian forces during World War II. As a skillful sniper, you are enlisted to carry out dangerous and deadly missions throughout Berlin.
*Use skill, patience and cunning to accomplish your mission while handling the anticipation and pressure of the hunt and facing life-changing decisions.
*Take gravity, wind, velocity, bullet penetration, aim stability and more into account as you sight-in your target in this realistic simulation of military sharpshooting.
*Arm yourself and take down your targets with authentic weapons such as the Springfield M1903, the Gewehr 43 and the Mosin-Nagant 1891/30.
*Witness the gory details with the amazing X-ray Kill Cam which shows what happens when your bullet enters an enemy's body.
Do you think you’re ready to take down the enemy? If so, then grab your rifle and get going.
GAME 3: Mortal Kombat - PS Vita
Next we have the PS Vita version of 2011’s highly acclaimed reboot to the long running Mortal Kombat series.
*The game contains the story mode from the console release of the game, and all of the DLC characters and costumes that have been made available. So you can eviscerate as Freddy Krueger or even as the God of War himself, Kratos.
*In addition to this, the game harnesses the PS Vita's touchscreen capabilities, and built-in accelerometer to provide exclusive modes, including: the all-new Challenge Tower mode, and Test Your Slice and Test Your Might modes.
*The game will make use of the Vita’s touchscreen for use in fatalities, among others, and will also make use of the systems accelerometer.
*You can challenge your friends across both ad hoc and over WiFi.
It’s the same great fighting game that came out last year, but now it’s in a handy to go form.
GAME 4: Awesomenauts - PSN, XBLA
Our first digital game this week is a side scrolling action shooter that looks as awesome as its name: Awesomenauts.
*According to the game’s website: "In the distant future...It's the year 3587, conflict spans the stars. Huge robot armies are locked in an enduring stalemate. In their bid for galactic conquest they call upon the most powerfull group of mercenaries in the universe: the Awesomenauts!"
*Awesomenauts brings team-based competetive arena play to a platforming perspective. Play and customize several Awesomenauts as you storm the online battlegrounds and unlock loads of new abilities and characters for your arsenal.
It looks like a pretty dope kinda game. You can grab it from both Xbox Live and the Playstation Store.
GAME 5: Fable Heroes - XBLA
And lastly we have Fable Heroes.
*Fable Heroes is a fresh spin on the beloved Fable franchise in which up to four players play both cooperatively and competitively in this hack-and-slash adventure. Work together as heroes of Albion to defeat familiar foes and new enemies while collecting as many gold coins as possible to unlock upgrades, characters, and items in both this game and Fable: The Journey for Xbox 360.
It looks like a cutesy kinda game, and the integration with Fable: The Journey might come in handy when that game launches later this year.
Be sure to catch past episodes of Press Pause. To do that, you just need to go to presspause.mevio.com , or our YouTube channel youtube.com/presspausemevio .
2 Views
18:48:07 04/27/12
For The Foxes - The River
[LESS INFO] 2 VIEWS | ADDED 18:48:07 04/27/12
For The Foxes - The River
Buy the EP on iTunes here: smarturl.it Buy the EP from Hopeless Records here: hopel.es More from For The Foxes: hopel.es More from Hopeless Records: hopel.es Lyrics: lay down so I donʼt feel so sick get lost and dream Los Angeles wake up when I found the river lay low and walk down lazy streets with a peace sign cut from a magazine wake up when I found the river and Iʼm listening wherever you are when Iʼm on the road weʼre driving back past country homes Iʼm calling home for you for you this is the last time so darling close your eyes we donʼt say goodbye so weʼll just say goodnight this is the last time so jump into that fire we donʼt say goodbye weʼll just say goodnight closed eyes I cancel out the green thoughts bounce around like trampolines wake up weʼre next to the river sunsets they race down boulevards street lights lit up like dim cigars wake up weʼre back in september wherever you are when Iʼm on the road weʼre driving back down country roads Iʼm calling home for you for you no wherever you are when Iʼm on the road we donʼt have to feel alone Iʼm calling home for you for you lay down so I donʼt feel so sick wake up to see you once again From: HopelessRecords Views: 2839 105 ratings Time: 03:46 More in Music
1 Views
18:12:53 04/18/12
Biggest NFL Draft Busts the Last 10 Years: NFL Draft 365 ep.10
[LESS INFO] 1 VIEWS | ADDED 18:12:53 04/18/12
Biggest NFL Draft Busts the Last 10 Years: NFL Draft 365 ep.10
When it comes to NFL draft busts, the usual names come up like Ryan Leaf, Tony Mandarich, Ki-Jana Carter or the "Boz". If you look at worst years for draft busts, there's no doubt 1999 was "Not the Year of the QB'. Tim Couch got the ball rolling as he was the number one overall pick by the Cleveland Browns. Also available in the first round for the Browns in '99 was Donovan McNabb, Edgerin James, Torry Holt and Champ Bailey. But the Browns are indeed the Browns. The big question, what will they do with their 4th overall pick in 2012? For Cleveland's sake, hopefully they won't be partying like it's 1999. But Cleveland was not alone in 1999. The Bungles, err, Bengals selected Akili Smith with the 3rd overall pick. Da Bears took the forgettable Cade McNown with the 12th overall pick. We asked our Bleacher Report staff to come up with their top five NFL draft busts in the last 10 years or since 2002. Yes, we limited the list to only five. We can tell you that our guys did not get to Joey Harrington, DeWayne Robertson, Mike Williams or Brady Quinn. We're sure you have lots more too. NFLDraft365 is a production of Bleacher Report Videos. The show highlights all of the players, news, happenings and opinion surrounding the NFL Draft and is covered year-round for NFL fans, who are serious about their teams. Remember to Subscribe! goo.gl NFL Draft 365 on Twitter - www.twitter.com NFL Draft 365 on Facebook - www.facebook.com From: BleacherReport Views: 13101 35 ratings Time: 02:48 More in Sports
0 Views
22:13:21 03/26/12
Senator Menendez on Floor Discussing Repeal Big Oil Tax Subsidies Act
[LESS INFO] 0 VIEWS | ADDED 22:13:21 03/26/12
Senator Menendez on Floor Discussing Repeal Big Oil Tax Subsidies Act
The United States Senate tonight voted overwhelmingly to allow debate on Senator Menendez's Repeal Big Oil Tax Subsidies Act, which would end taxpayer-funded loopholes to the five largest, most profitable oil companies in the world (Big 5) and use those savings to extend for one year expiring energy tax provisions and reduce the deficit. "This debate is pretty simple. It's about whose side you're on. You're either on the side of Big Oil companies making record profits, or you're on the side of middle class American families who can't afford the price at the pump -- let alone afford to chip in billions of dollars more to make oil profits even higher," said Menendez. "We know whose side Big Oil is on when they take $24 billion in taxpayer money and actually produce less oil, not more, leaving families with higher gas prices while they continue to make record profits." From: SenatorMenendezNJ Views: 144 5 ratings Time: 06:00 More in News & Politics
1 Views
17:43:01 03/26/12
EMMURE "Protoman" Music Video Preview
[LESS INFO] 1 VIEWS | ADDED 17:43:01 03/26/12
EMMURE "Protoman" Music Video Preview
Order EMMURE's "Slave To The Game" now: www.victoryrecords.com Get "Protoman" & "I Am Onslaught" on iTunes & AmazonMp3 TODAY. iTunes: bit.ly AmazonMp3: amzn.to SLAVE TO THE GAME in stores APRIL 10 Catch EMMURE on tour with WE CAME AS ROMANS: www.victoryrecords.com EMMURE FB: www.facebook.com YouTube: www.YouTube.com Spotify: spoti.fi Merch: www.victoryrecords.com Directed By: Frankie Nasso "Protoman" I stand alone , But I will not be broken. The Truest words I've spoken. Blood runs thin. I stand proof of this. Where is my family when I need them? So alone , I will make sure I'm never forgotten. I see clearly you are my enemy. And now my dreams are slowly escaping me. I don't need anyone. I don't need you. I'm ok with dying alone. Dig my grave. I hope you feel the same. Bide by time. I'm gonna die. You're gonna die. No one cares. Let them take me now. I'm already dead. All I want is power and control. My cold soul YOUR MUSIC - YOUR LABEL - VICTORY RECORDS www.VictoryRecords.com http From: VictorVTV Views: 4291 65 ratings Time: 00:39 More in Music
0 Views
19:11:38 03/15/12
Study: Rejected Male Flies Turn to Alcohol
[LESS INFO] 0 VIEWS | ADDED 19:11:38 03/15/12
Study: Rejected Male Flies Turn to Alcohol
Guys, when your honey says ``No thanks'' to sex, do you knock back a few stiff drinks to feel better? You're not alone: Fruit flies do the same thing. (March 15) Subscribe to the Associated Press: bit.ly Download AP Mobile: www.ap.org Associated Press on Facebook: apne.ws Associated Press on Twitter: apne.ws Associated Press on Google+: bit.ly From: AssociatedPress Views: 2242 48 ratings Time: 01:59 More in Science & Technology
17 Views
19:51:03 03/12/12
Size matters: shrink it till she leaves you alone
[LESS INFO] 17 VIEWS | ADDED 19:51:03 03/12/12
Size matters: shrink it till she leaves you alone
How do you avoid sex when you're such a sexy hunk ? Women don't care about size / Are you sure ? Country: Denmark Brand: Opasia Year: 2002 More commercials : www.youtube.com .. All rights reserved. For all inquiries, please mail to culturepub@wizdeo.com From: CulturePub Views: 3216 41 ratings Time: 00:57 More in Science & Technology
9 Views
19:31:02 02/09/12
Kung Fu Strike: The Warrior's Rise - Announcement Reveal Trailer (XBLA)
[LESS INFO] 9 VIEWS | ADDED 19:31:02 02/09/12
Kung Fu Strike: The Warrior's Rise - Announcement Reveal Trailer (XBLA)
We are on Facebook.com and Twitter.com Ready yourself, grasshopper, for Qooc Soft's arcade beat 'em up is coming to Xbox Live Arcade early in 2012. ABOUT THIS GAME ************************ Kung Fu Strike: The Warrior's Rise, a fast-paced beat-'em-up where the player can seamlessly blend powerful punches, high kicks and perfectly timed blocks to pull off combos that devastate hordes of enemies. Alongside the tight combat system and art style inspired by Chinese calligraphy, Kung Fu Strike features unlockable techniques that add to the repertoire of agony for your enemies, support characters that can be called in to help when your fists fail you and special equipment that can potentially turn the tide of battle. What's more, if you're too weak and puny to go it alone, there is local two-player co-op and versus mode to prove you are the martial arts maestro. Developed by Qooc Soft, Kung Fu Strike: The Warrior's Rise will arrive for Xbox 360 via Xbox LIVE Arcade. Kung Fu Strike: The Warrior's Rise ******************************************* GENRE: Action Fighting RELEASE DATE(S): + US: Early 2012 + EU: Early 2012 PLATFORM: XBLA EXCLUSIVELY ON: XBLA WEBSITE: kungfustrike.7sixty.com AVAILABLE @ AMAZON: n/a PUBLISHER: 7sixty DEVELOPER: Qooc Soft ESRB: RP for Rating Pending XboxViewTV on FACEBOOK *********************************** www.facebook.com XboxViewTV ON TWITTER ******************************* www.twitter.com From: XboxViewTV Views: 1275 31 ratings Time: 01:20 More in Gaming
0 Views
23:40:56 01/17/12
Send Us ALL Your Movies! : Movie Quest 029
[LESS INFO] 0 VIEWS | ADDED 23:40:56 01/17/12
Send Us ALL Your Movies! : Movie Quest 029
CLICK HERE TO START: www.youtube.com LIVE CHAT WITH RUSS AND CHAD OF HEY KILLER!! Wednesdays, 12pm-3pm EST at: livestream.com Oh, and they leave it on a lot randomly during the week while they work. Like them on Facebook to get notified when they're online! facebook.com Submit your favorite Youtube videos by sending a message directly to heykillerfilms on Youtube, on the Hey Killer Facebook at facebook.com/heykillerfilms, on Twitter @heykillerfilms, or by email at heykillerfilms@gmail.com. Attention all Indy Mogul subscribers who ALSO happen to be indie filmmakers! The Indy Mogul community continues to grow and each week we find new and exciting channels to feature, most of whom haven't yet found a large audience and benefit greatly from being featured! Send us your own work if you haven't, and you might just make it on the show! For iPhone/iPad users, check out the videos by clicking the links below: Alone: www.youtube.com Garbage Day: www.youtube.com Star Wars Dubstep: www.youtube.com Beware of Guard: www.youtube.com AL-KO in Love: www.youtube.com Movie Quest Outro: www.youtube.com HUD -- Heads Up Display: www.youtube.com Badlands: www.youtube.com Click the link at the top of this list to watch all the videos in the proper order. Music Kevin MacLeod www.incompetech.com From: indymogul Views: 19666 64 ratings Time: 05:55 More in Film & Animation
2 Views
05:43:04 01/12/12
Jim Messina: 2011 Fourth Quarter Fundraising Update
[LESS INFO] 2 VIEWS | ADDED 05:43:04 01/12/12
Jim Messina: 2011 Fourth Quarter Fundraising Update
Tell your friends to own a piece of this campaign: my.barackobama.com Jim Messina shares how the campaign has set a record pace with more than 1.3 million donors -- more than 583000 people in this quarter alone, more than 200000 of whom hadn't donated yet in 2011 or in the 2008 campaign. More than 98% of those donations were $250 or below. When we get an opponent soon, we'll be facing down their fundraising operation%mdashthese guys not only don't have the grassroots support we have, but they actually don't even believe in it. You're the reason why President Obama got this job and you're the reason he's going to keep it. Forward this video to the next friend who wonders why the Obama campaign is asking them for money: my.barackobama.com From: BarackObamadotcom Views: 51606 1322 ratings Time: 03:27 More in News & Politics
3 Views
07:41:54 12/28/11
On "If I were a poor Black kid"...
[LESS INFO] 3 VIEWS | ADDED 07:41:54 12/28/11
[ VIDEO ] Joe Hicks discusses the controversy over Gene Marks' blog post at Forbes entitled " If I were a poor Black kid ". Basically he asks, "Why can't white people contribute to the national dialogue on race and racism?"
It does seem like a cop out to just tell someone that they have nothing to say because they're not a poor Black child so they can't relate in any way. I've had a white geography teacher in high school - GO FALCONS - who said that he could relate because he was poor. Of course the conclusion could be that he thinks all Blacks are poor, but that's only a thought and not necessarily based on reality.
All the same Marks bounces off of a recent speech by President Obama in Kansas where he discussed the gap between the rich and the poor:
> The President’s speech got me thinking. My kids are no smarter than similar kids their age from the inner city. My kids have it much easier than their counterparts from West Philadelphia . The world is not fair to those kids mainly because they had the misfortune of being born two miles away into a more difficult part of the world and with a skin color that makes realizing the opportunities that the President spoke about that much harder. This is a fact. In 2011.
I am not a poor black kid. I am a middle aged white guy who comes from a middle class white background. So life was easier for me. But that doesn’t mean that the prospects are impossible for those kids from the inner city. It doesn’t mean that there are no opportunities for them. Or that the 1% control the world and the rest of us have to fight over the scraps left behind. I don’t believe that. I believe that everyone in this country has a chance to succeed. Still. In 2011. Even a poor black kid in West Philadelphia.
It takes brains. It takes hard work. It takes a little luck. And a little help from others. It takes the ability and the know-how to use the resources that are available. Like technology. As a person who sells and has worked with technology all my life I also know this.
If I was a poor black kid I would first and most importantly work to make sure I got the best grades possible. I would make it my #1 priority to be able to read sufficiently. I wouldn’t care if I was a student at the worst public middle school in the worst inner city. Even the worst have their best. And the very best students, even at the worst schools, have more opportunities. Getting good grades is the key to having more options. With good grades you can choose different, better paths. If you do poorly in school, particularly in a lousy school, you’re severely limiting the limited opportunities you have.
And I would use the technology available to me as a student. I know a few school teachers and they tell me that many inner city parents usually have or can afford cheap computers and internet service nowadays. That because (and sadly) it’s oftentimes a necessary thing to keep their kids safe at home than on the streets. And libraries and schools have computers available too. Computers can be purchased cheaply at outlets like TigerDirect and Dell’s Outlet . Professional organizations like accountants and architects often offer used computers from their members, sometimes at no cost at all. You will see at the end of this posting links to several rebuts to Marks' comments. I will add my two cents just as Hicks and those other links have.
I didn't go to the very best schools in Chicago. I'd say my old elementary school was an average at best school and my old high school - when I attended - was one of the worst. My marks weren't that great in elementary school but for some reason my marks in high school were often in the honor roll range. With that in mind though I consider that a fluke today.
My time in high school wasn't a time to seek out options. I never thought of my grades as a ticket mainly because they were had too easy. It was never a challenge academically and who knows how that would've been weathered. The serious challenge was in college where I struggled to keep up.
If only I had the tools back then that the young people have today to help me study and understand the various subjects. I wouldn't just be ahead of my peers but it would be light years ahead of them. But when I was in public school most of those tools did not yet exist.
In spite of the nay sayers - and I will get to one in a moment - Marks isn't wrong. Make the best grades you can where you are take advantage of all the tools you can. Don't have a PC at home go somewhere to use one, especially the library. At that there are people at your school who if you establish a relationship with them will help you move forward.
This nay sayer, well is making more of this than he realizes:
> No believer in Bell Curv-ish nonsense about black intellectual inferiority, Marks makes clear that the children about whom he speaks are no less capable than his own kids. Of course, one wonders just how much of a compliment Marks really intends for this to be, given his strange habit of dissing his offspring, on more than one occasion, as rather unintelligent, unmotivated, promiscuous and even inclined to petty criminality. Not sure what kind of asshole says things like this about his children in print, but I suppose we can leave that discussion for another day.
No doubt Marks would say that he was simply encouraging poor African American kids to take personal responsibility for their success. He might even say that by acknowledging unfair and unjust structural inequity (and even, indirectly, white privilege), he was doing so in a politically ecumenical way. Certainly Marks would perceive his words and intentions as quite different from those of right-wingers whose hectoring of the poor so often involves blaming those at the bottom of the nation’s economic hierarchy for their station in life. To Marks, poor black kids are not to blame for the position in which they find themselves, but they nonetheless hold the keys to their own liberation, and if they would simply follow his sage counsel they could surely make it, like anyone else: even the cerebrally challenged and oversexed spawn who slumber each night just down the hall from he and his wife.
There is much one could say about Marks’s advice — rather typical bootstrapping fare about studying hard, coupled with a more modern emphasis on becoming a techie like him, and thereby, presumably, an irresistible college or job applicant — and most of it has been said already. Like, for instance, this piece , or this one , or this one , or maybe this one , all of which eloquently critique the privileged and naive mindset displayed by Marks, and explain how even when poor kids of color do everything right, the structures of society are too often set up to help them fail anyway.
...
And it’s this last point that we might do well to explore further. Fact is, Gene Marks knows his readership at Forbes . He knows that it includes virtually none of the people to whom he is ostensibly offering advice, which means that he isn’t really giving them advice at all; rather, he is inviting his mostly white, mostly affluent audience to engage in a perverse moralistic voyeurism at the expense of impoverished African American youth, almost none of whom that readership will ever meet, and whom they will, in fact, go out of their way to avoid. He is offering a kind of secret white-male handshake to others in the club, assuring them that the problems of urban poverty are not theirs to fix, that they are off the hook as it were, and isn’t that a relief? That Marks may not be as vile in his desire to blame the poor for their status as some, hardly acquits him of the charge that by pandering to the biases of his readership, he has, with some 700-odd simple (and simplistic) words, managed to reinscribe all the worst of their prejudices, many of which one can see on grand display in the readers’ comments section of the original article. Make no mistake, Gene Marks’s column is contempt cloaked as compassion and bigotry dressed up as benevolence. And it can do nothing but contribute to the indifference and even antipathy towards the poor that those who rely on Forbes for insights already possess in ample supply. Starting with that last paragraph it's true, Forbes may not have a significant audience in poor inner city communities. Without having to purchase a subscription you can always go to a library to access past issues of magazines. Also with internet access you can access magazines as well and blog posts such as this one which surely don't require a subscription.
As for Mr. Tim Wise who wrote the above excerpts, how is he going to call that man out for what he refers to his kids. Yeah it may be wrong to say your kids are very bright, but somewhere out there some parent is doing it. I also recognize that Marks is merely a commentator who is definitely using his platform to say what he wants to say.
The main point surely Marks is making is that his children are not much different than poor inner city children. Just that they have different opportunities living in a different part of the Philadelphia area than the inner city children. Perhaps even different expectations from parents, perhaps different staff and different schools. He didn't write the "poor black kid" piece to denigrate his children.
I think what he wrote was real. It shouldn't be impeached merely for that reason. That alone is weak! Although to Mr. Wise's credit he is at least has some suggestions for Marks to put his money where his mouth is. Marks could always help get the information out aside from using his platform at Forbes.
5 Views
18:51:02 12/22/11
Breakout Stars of 2011
[LESS INFO] 5 VIEWS | ADDED 18:51:02 12/22/11
Breakout Stars of 2011
Pippa Middleton almost steals the show at the Royal Wedding, Melissa McCarthy's hilarious role in Bridesmaids, Justin Theroux becomes Jennifer Aniston's new beau and more celebs who stepped into the spotlight in 2011! A YEAR AGO, THE NAMES CHAZ AND PIPPA PROBABLY DIDN'T MEAN ANYTHING TO YOU, BUT FAST-FORWARD 12 MONTHS AND YOU'RE ON A FIRST-NAME BASIS. AND THAT'S WHAT MAKES THEM TWO OF CELEBTV'S BREAKOUT STARS OF 2011. IT'S PRETTY HARD TO UPSTAGE ANY BRIDE -- LET ALONE A ROYAL ONE -- BUT PIPPA MIDDLETON DID JUST THAT. SURE, KATE LOOKED GREAT ON HER WEDDING DAY, BUT PIPPA WAS THE TALK OF THE TOWN AFTER WOWWING IN HER SLEEK WHITE GOWN THAT SHOWED OFF HER AMPLE ASSETS. ON NO TIME, THE WHOLE WORLD WAS FASCINATED WITH KATE'S YOUNGER SISTER. ANOTHER BRIDESMAID MAKES OUR LIST THIS YEAR... WHO COULD FORGET THIS SCENE-STEALER FROM BRIDESMAIDS. MELISSA MCCARTHY MUST'VE FELT LIKE A PRINCESS HERSELF WHEN SHE ACCEPTED HER EMMY FOR "MIKE AND MOLLY" WHILE WEARING HER VERY OWN TIARA. JUSTIN WHO? THAT'S PRETTY MUCH WHAT EVERYONE SAID WHEN WE HEARD JENNIFER ANISTON HAD A NEW MAN, BUT AFTER SEEING PLENTY OF PICS OF THE HAPPY COUPLE CAVORTING, MR. THEROUX BECAME A HOUSEHOLD NAME. WE'VE KNOWN THE OLSEN TWINS FOR DECADES, BUT ONLY THIS YEAR WERE WE INTRODUCED TO THEIR SISTER, ELIZABETH. THE YOUNGER OLSEN RECEIVED RAVE REVIEWS FOR "MARTHA MARCY MAY MARLENE" -- AND HAS SEVERAL FILMS IN THE WORKS FOR 2012. FINALLY, A HEARTY "YOU DA MAN" FOR CHAZ BONO, WHO MADE A BIG SPLASH ON DANCING WITH THE ... From: CelebTV Views: 914 9 ratings Time: 01:48 More in Entertainment
13 Views
20:00:00 12/19/11
Havel the Dissident: A Legacy Worth Claiming
[LESS INFO] 13 VIEWS | ADDED 20:00:00 12/19/11
Former President Havel addresses a European cultural congress on the economics of culture
On a warm evening in 1991, a colleague and I found an out-of-the-way café in the old part of Prague. Two men with blank expressions stood outside. The interior was dim and close, with room for only eight or nine tables. The place was almost empty. Just a sleepy waitress, a bartender polishing glasses, and a single patron who sat alone drinking wine and chain-smoking cigarettes.
The President of Czechoslovakia wasn't reviewing official papers. He was reading a book, a startlingly un-Presidential act to our American eyes. My companion, a neoconservative State Department official, already admired him for defying and defeating a Communist state. He'd impressed me by bringing a writer's sensibility and an affinity for true underground culture to his role as head of state.
Václav Havel even tried to appoint Frank Zappa as his Minister of Culture. "We're not rock musicians," Zappa told a reporter back in the sixties. "We're electronic social workers." The State Department wouldn't let Zappa assume the post, but Havel had made his point to the Czech public by offering this apparatchik's position to the composer of songs like "What's the Ugliest Part of Your Body?" ("Some say your nose, some say your toes, but I think it's your mind .")
We never spoke to Havel that night. It didn't seem polite to offer anything more than the curt nod of acknowledgement any café patron gives another at that hour. But Havel spoke to us, to all of us. And on the occasion of his death, the real lessons of his life's work are in danger of being lost.
Today we're told that the Occupy movement is too idealistic, too naïve. Naïve? Try Havel's words if you want naïve: "May truth and love triumph over lies and hatred."
Think of that as the Velvet Revolution's "one demand."
Portrait of the President as a Young Freak
As millions of people know, the underground playwright Havel first made his political mark in Charter 77. That group was formed to defend the Plastic People of the Universe, a banned and imprisoned rock band working in the Zappa mold of musical dissonance and cultural dissidence.
The Occupy movement is not on the cultural fringe, despite what its detractors say. But Havel's movement began as a Yippie-like creature of the underworld. Charter 77 rarely had more than a thousand members. It was a strange blend of political idealism and the hippie subculture where people proudly labeled themselves "freaks" to the conventional world. Despite its later alignment with economically conservative forces, it was more Allen Ginsburg than Alan Greenspan.
And it was created to defend the Plastic People of the Universe, whose grating music makes Occupy's drum circles seem like a children's choir serenading the bored residents of a home for aging veterans.
Words
Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité - what wonderful words! And how terrifying their meaning can be! Freedom in the shirt unbuttoned before execution. Equality in the constant speed of the guillotine's fall on different necks. Fraternity in some dubious paradise ...
Havel addressed the liberal democratic West on words in the 1970s, noting that the suppression of speech can give language enormous power: >
I ... live in a country where a writers' congress speech is capable of shaking the system ... a manifesto served as one of the pretexts for the invasion of our country one night by five foreign armies ... a system in which words are capable of shaking the entire structure of government, where words can prove mightier than ten military divisions.
When a system has become inflexible and is in danger of collapsing, what it fears most is words. Think about that the next time you see a phalanx of cops tear down a tent city on television.
Havel had been burned by language, too: >
The same word can at one moment radiate great hope, at another it can emit lethal rays ... true at one moment and false the next, at one moment illuminating, at another, deceptive. On one occasion it can open up glorious horizons, on another, it can lay down the tracks to an entire archipelago of concentration camps.
And as we approach an election year that will be filled with the rhetoric of freedom, this observation still resonates: >
The same word can at one time be the cornerstone of peace, while at another time machine-gun fire resounds in its every syllable.
Control
In 1975 Havel had the presumption to write directly to Czechoslovakian head of state Gustáv Husák with a few suggestions. There's more than a passing resemblance between the fear-driven Communist society Havel condemned in that letter and the financial anxiety many Americans endure today: >
The technique of existential pressure is ... universal. There is no one in our country who is not, in a broad sense, existentially vulnerable. Everyone has something to lose and so everyone has reason to be afraid. The range of things one can lose is broad, extending from the manifold privileges of the ruling caste... down to the mere possibility of living in that limited degree of legal certainty available to other citizens.
Today, one out of two Americans lives in financial insecurity. Even many upper-middle-class citizens live from month to month, just one layoff notice away from medical bankruptcy or home foreclosure.
"Everyone has something to lose," observed Havel.
Havel's description of his 20th Century Communist society echoes our own: >
The more completely one abandons any hope of general reform, any interest in suprapersonal goals and values, or any chance of exercising influence in an 'outward' direction, the more one's energy is diverted in the direction of least resistance, that is, 'inwards.'"
People today are preoccupied far more with themselves ... They fill their homes with all kinds of appliances and pretty things, they try to improve their accommodations, they try to make life pleasant for themselves, building cottages, looking after their cars, taking more interest in food and clothing and domestic comfort ...They turn their main attention to the material aspects of their private lives.
Havel concluded that "Despair leads to apathy, apathy to conformity, and conformity to routine (political) performance - which is then quoted as evidence of 'mass political involvement.'"
Ambition
Havel understood the psychology of greed and power, too. From his letter to Husák: >
If it is fear which lies behind people's defensive attempts to preserve what they have, it becomes increasingly apparent that the chief impulses for their aggressive efforts to win what they do not yet possess are selfishness and careerism.
It is not surprising that so many public and influential positions are occupied more than ever before by notorious careerists, opportunists, charlatans, and men of dubious record.
From Prague to Washington, from Moscow to lower Manhattan, the opportunities change. But human nature never does: >
Seldom in recent times has a social system offered scope so openly and so brazenly to people willing to support anything as long as it brings them some advantage; to unprincipled and spineless men, prepared to do anything in their craving for power and personal gain; to born lackeys, ready for any humiliation and willing at all times to sacrifice their neighbors' and their own honor for a chance to ingratiate themselves with those in power.
Technocracy
It's a historical irony that those who claim they'll govern with the most efficiency usually wind up governing with the least effectiveness. Today corporate-funded politicians from both parties argue that the country should be led by "technocrats' who'll govern without messy "ideologies."
That's a false premise Havel knew well. He called it the "process by which power becomes anonymous and depersonalized, reduced to a mere technology of rule and manipulation."
Washington's technocratic "bipartisans" dream of a world where, in Havel's words, the "professional ruler is (seen as) the 'innocent' tool of an 'innocent' anonymous power ... legitimized by science, cybernetics, ideology, law, abstraction, and objectivity - that is, by everything except personal responsibility to human beings as persons and neighbors." Havel's Prague is our Beltway: >
States grow ever more machinelike; people are transformed into statistical choruses of voters, producers, consumers, patients, tourists, or soldiers, (where) in politics good and evil, categories of the natural world and therefore obsolete remnants of the past, lose all absolute meaning (and where) the sole method of politics is quantifiable success.
Havel condemned a system of state-orchestrated political theater, and the self-perpetuating failures of imagination which mistook the indifferent and pro forma participation of its citizens for genuine democracy. And he saw its universal nature: >
(It) has a thousand masks, variants, and expressions. Essentially, though, it is the same universal trend ... the essential trait of all modern civilization, growing directly from its spiritual structure, rooted in it by a thousand tangled tendrils and inseparable even in thought from its technological nature, its mass characteristics, and its consumer orientation.
"The contemporary concept of 'normal' behavior is," Havel wrote, "deeply pessimistic."
Responsibility
"I favor 'antipolitical politics,'" said Havel, "politics not as the technology of power and manipulation, of cybernetic rule over humans or as the art of the utilitarian, but politics as one of the ways of seeking and achieving meaningful lives, of protecting them and serving them." >
I favor politics as practical morality, as service to the truth, as essentially human and humanly measured care for our fellow humans.
None of us--as an individual--can save the world as a whole, but . . . each of us must behave as though it were in his power to do so.
Decades later he said this to the leaders of Western countries: >
Today, more than ever before in the history of mankind, everything is interrelated ... Because of this, the future of the United States or the European Union is being decided in suffering Sarajevo or Mostar, in the plundered Brazilian rain forests, in the wretched poverty of Bangladesh or Somalia.
Havel had glaring faults. American neocons offered him small favors during his final rise to power. He reciprocated, consciously or unconsciously, by aiding their destructive military ventures and adopting their foolish economic policies. He succumbed to the politics of personality, both his own and those of the leaders who courted him. But it would be a shame if that's all the world remembered.
Havel seemed unhappy in the role of leader. It's possible than he lost sight of his deepest insights, his truest gifts. It was the outsider Havel, the dreamer of the impossible, the surrealist and absurdist, we should remember. That's the Havel who can and should inspire dissidents everywhere.
"Is the human word truly powerful enough to change the world and influence history?" he once asked. With his life and his words, Václav Havel gave us his answer. He showed us the power in each individual and the responsibility that accompanies that power.
At his best, and above all else, Havel was a dissident outsider who realized his power and used it. Now it's our turn.
2 Views
01:06:37 12/18/11
Mistletoe Kiss
[LESS INFO] 2 VIEWS | ADDED 01:06:37 12/18/11
Mistletoe Kiss
*update* I've been noticing a lot of negative comments about how fake the "crease" looks. :( This holiday look is suppose to be photo friendly, especially when you look straight ahead. Of course whenever I look down, it'll look unnatural, because I didn't want to over blend. The line on the fake crease will show up better if it has a stronger edge. So in photos, it will look amazing. ^_^ Holiday parties, dance, get together, dinner date, whatever the occasion may be, you want to look fab, even if you're home alone like me. :/ This look was created using products from December's Glambag from MyGlam www.myglam.com January's Glambags are open for subscription, subscribe before we run out! :D Thank you Kassandra Swygard for naming this look ^_^ Please check out my website, it's updated daily! www.michellephan.com %hearts Follow me on twitter! %hearts www.twitter.com %hearts Like me on Facebook! %hearts www.facebook.com %hearts Subscribe me on my personal Facebook! www.facebook.com Music by Mindy Gledhill from her new Christmas Album Winter Moon itunes.apple.com www.facebook.com www.mindygledhill.com Products used in order Cream Foundation from Asia, but similar formula from RCMA www.naimies.com Powder from Laura Mercier Anastasia Brow Whiz Urban Decay Primer Potion Peach Eyeshadow from my makeup kit Brown Matte Eyeshadow from MakeUp Forever #17 Urban Decay Eyeshadow Sin Shu Uemura Brown Gel Liner Shu Uemura Lash Curler Tarte Lights, Camera, Lashes mascara Mai Couture Blush Sheets www.maicouture.com ... From: MichellePhan Views: 1851643 23372 ratings Time: 06:59 More in Howto & Style













