Find a show you like and click the 
button. The show will be added to your My Playlist page and updated 24/7 with new videos.
Search Results
0 Views
23:00:37 02/08/12
Elderly Civil Rights Activist Faces Foreclosure, Eviction
[LESS INFO] 0 VIEWS | ADDED 23:00:37 02/08/12
I've lost count of the number of reports I've read in recent years of an elderly person facing the trauma of losing their home to foreclosure and being taken by ambulance to the hospital on eviction day due to the effects of stress on their physical health. Or those who would rather end their own lives rather than face the possibility of being put out on the streets in their senior years.
The story of 78-year-old Helen Bailey is especially poignant this Black History Month, as she was active in the civil rights movement and marched with Martin Luther King.
Change.org has started a petition calling on Chase Bank to make a settlement with Ms. Bailey, and cancel any scheduled foreclosure auction: >
Helen Bailey is a 78-year-old grandmother who participated in the civil rights movement, worked as a childcare provider for autistic children, and was a community volunteer. She has paid her mortgage since 1999, but now she can't keep up the payments. All she wants is to stay in her home until she dies, in the neighborhood where she feels safe and has lived for nearly quarter of a century. She could have refinanced with a company willing to let her live in the house for free until her death, but Chase Bank would not reduce her principal by $9,000. She's been paying 7% interest, well above most rates, so Chase could have decided they had made enough. Instead, they have started foreclosure and Ms. Bailey could end on the street.
Since then, Ms. Bailey's lawyer has found an alternate buyer for her home. This sale would provide Ms Bailey with an exit from her current mortgage and allow her to pursue other options for housing. We request that Chase:
· accept the offer of $85,000
· write off any deficiency between the loan balance and the offer
· waive all interest, legal fees and penalties accrued since the initial refinance offer
· cancel any foreclosure auction scheduled
It has been estimated that at foreclosure, Chase may lose over $30,000 compared to this settlement offer. Therefore this option makes the most sense financially for Chase and given Ms Bailey's specific circumstances, there is little moral hazard in this solution.
If you'd like to add your name to the petition calling on Chase to keep Ms. Bailey in her home, you may do so online here .
0 Views
11:27:07 02/02/12
Treasure hunter finds $3B WWII wreck and Polo Club Founder Adopts Girlfriend
[LESS INFO] 0 VIEWS | ADDED 11:27:07 02/02/12
Welcome to CRWE Newswire News Update, I'm Christina Collins. A treasure hunter said he has found the wreck of a British merchant ship torpedoed by a German U-boat off Cape Cod during World War II while carrying what he claims was a load of platinum bars now worth more than $3 billion. Should his claim prove to be true, it could be one of the richest sunken treasures ever discovered. An attorney for the British government doubts the vessel was carrying platinum, and if it was laden with precious metals, who owns the hoard could become a matter of international dispute. Treasure hunter Greg Brooks of Sub Sea Research in Gorham, Maine, announced that a wreck found sitting in 700 feet of water 50 miles offshore is that of the S.S. Port Nicholson, sunk in 1942. A Florida polo club founder has adopted his longtime adult girlfriend in what attorneys believe may be a legal maneuver to protect his financial assets as he faces a trial for a drunk driving incident that killed a 23-year-old. John Goodman, formally adopted Heather Laruso Hutchins in October 2011. The couple started dating in 2009. Goodman is the founder of the International Polo Club Palm Beach in Wellington, Fla. Judge Glenn Kelley wrote in a court order that the Defendant has effectively diverted a significant portion of the assets of the children's trust to a person with whom he is intimately involved at a time when his personal assets are largely at risk in this case. Goodman is being sued by Lili and William Wilson for the wrongful death of their son Scott Patrick Wilson, who died in a car crash on Feb. 12, 2010. Goodman ran a stop sign and slammed into Wilson's car. Goodman did not call police or an ambulance, but left the crash scene on foot, it was determined that Goodman's blood alcohol level was more than twice the legal limit. Thank you for joining me for and stay with us for all your latest in News for CRWENewswire News Update, I'm Christina Collins. ********************************* THIS IS NOT A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY OR SELL ANY SECURITY! Disclaimer: Never invest in any stock featured on our site or emails unless you can afford to lose your entire investment. crwenewswire.com publisher and its affiliates and contractors are not registered investment advisers or broker/dealers.Our disclaimer (Read more at http://www.crwenewswire.com/disclaimer) is to be read and fully understood before using our site, reading our newsletter or joining our email list. Release of Liability: Through use of this website viewing or using, you agree to hold crwenewswire.com report and Crown Equity Holdings Inc. CRWE, its operators, shareholders, employees and/or contractors harmless and to completely release them from any and all liability due to any and all loss (monetary or otherwise), damages (monetary or otherwise) that you may occur. Rule 17B requires disclosure of payment for investor relations. Crown Equity Holdings Inc. (CRWE.OB) is a media-advertisement and newswire company. Crown Equity Holdings Inc. (CRWE.OB), in some cases, provides media advertising and public awareness for both public and private companies, as well as disseminating news. As such, in some cases, when Crown Equity Holdings Inc. (CRWE.OB) advertises for a particular client, Crown Equity Holdings Inc. (CRWE.OB) charges an advertising fee which it must disclose under 17B. The fee may be in cash, in free trading stock or in restricted stock. Crown Equity Holdings Inc. (CRWE.OB), if paid in stock, can and may sell those securities during the advertising period.
2 Views
04:00:00 02/02/12
Next Assassin's Creed Rumors and SW:TOR Too Gay? - Press Pause Daily
[LESS INFO] 2 VIEWS | ADDED 04:00:00 02/02/12
Some rumors about the next Assassin’s Creed and is Star Wars: The Old Republic too gay?
SHOW NOTES:
Story 1:
A new game in the Assassin’s Creed franchise is coming later this year, and there are already rumors about where the story will take place this time. The last game, Assassin’s Creed: Revelations, closed the book on the story of original protagonist Altair as well as the last few games main character, Ezio Auditore. According to a story on the computerandvideogame.com website, the historical setting for the next game will take place during the American Revolution.
There are a few clues during the last couple of games that point in this direction, as well as a survey last year where, Ubisoft asked players where they would like to see the series go to next, and the American Revolution was one of the choices. The choice would be a very interesting one, as it would allow the player to interact with many historical people of the time. This could include George Washington, who is said to hold one of the game’s mysterious Pieces of Eden.
I know a lot of gamers are looking forward to the next installment of this series, and these rumors sound like it could be pretty awesome.
http://www.computerandvideogames.com/333754/assassins-creed-heads-to-american-revolution-rumour/
Story 2:
So Star Wars: The Old Republic has been out for a little over a month, and lots and lots of gamers are loving it. They really seem to like the freedom that BioWare have given them to play however they want to. And it’s that freedom that has the game under fire from a conservative religious website.
The Family Research Council have condemned the game for letting players have their characters get involved in same-sex relationships. According to them, it sends the wrong message to young people who might be playing the game, and say that BioWare should not allow the content in their game. This isn’t the first time that BioWare has allowed characters in their games to have same sex relationships. Gamers could do so in both the Mass Effect and Dragon Age games, so it’s hardly a suprise that the company would allow it here as well.
As for the Family Research Council, they are a conservative lobbying organization that have a long history of going after thing in pop culture that show the LGBT community in a positive light, especially when it comes to matters of same sex marriage.
In the end, I doubt that gamers will spend any time at all caring about what other people feel about their games, and how they choose to play them.
http://www.gamespot.com/news/star-wars-the-old-republic-denounced-for-gay-relationships-6349403
That will do it for your daily dose of Press Pause. You can always find all our episodes over at presspause.mevio.com . You can also check them out over at our Youtube channel: youtube.com/presspausemevio .
0 Views
10:16:41 01/31/12
Toy light sabers get man jailed: Donald Trump's endorsement coming soon
[LESS INFO] 0 VIEWS | ADDED 10:16:41 01/31/12
Welcome to CRWE Newswire News Update, I'm Christina Collins --- An Oregon judge is ordering a 45-day jail sentence and mental health evaluation for a man who attacked toy store customers with light sabers last December --- David Allen Canterbury told the judge that he is already seeking mental health treatment --- Canterbury also apologized to his victims --- Canterbury pleaded no contest Monday to assault and resisting arrest ---Police say Canterbury had a Star Wars light saber in each hand as he swung at three customers last Dec. 14 at a Toys R Us store --- He carried the light sabers outside the store and the also swung at police --- officers wrestled him to the ground and he has been banned from the toy store ### Out of the remaining four Republican candidates, Donald Trump would not indicate which would get his support, but he did single out Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich --- Stating that he likes and respects both and in a very short time he will be making an endorsement --- Trump said he won’t make a third party bid if the person he endorses becomes the nominee --- because he is prohibited from having both a TV show and a presidential campaign, he could not make a run until May --- But he hopes it won’t come to that --- Trump said he would rather endorse a great candidate that’s going to do a great job and win the election and become a great president as that is the number one option him --- Thank you for joining me for and stay with us for all your latest in News for CRWENewswire NewsUpdate, I'm Christina Collins ********************************* The Views and Opinions expressed by the author are his or her opinions only and do not necessarily reflect those of this Web-Site or its agents, affiliates, officers, directors, staff, or contractors. The author at the time of this article did not own any shares or receive any consideration financial or otherwise from any company or person mentioned or referred to in the article.
3 Views
20:03:42 01/30/12
The Muppets Hit Back at Fox News
[LESS INFO] 3 VIEWS | ADDED 20:03:42 01/30/12
Click here to view this media
I'm not sure "hit back" is the right phrase. More like gave a straightforward assessment of the horse's patoots employed by Fox News. Rupert Murdoch's influence is no less pernicious in Great Britain so the assembled reporters all had a hearty laugh.
Video by Russell Nelson of Leicester Square Tv . >
Kermit the Frog and Miss Piggy hit back at Fox News during a UK press conference following the London Premiere of their new film. Fox had publically criticized the film for supposedly pushing a 'dangerous liberal agenda' at kids.
Kermit mocks their blatant and pointless fear mongering before Miss Piggy offers her own opinion on Fox News.
Here is part of what was said when business anchor Eric Bolling asked "Are 'The Muppets' brainwashing our kids?"
Via Media Matters >
"What's actually going on here?" Bolling asked commentator Dan Gainor of the Media Research Center. "Is liberal Hollywood using class warfare to brainwash our kids?"
"Yes, absolutely, and they've been doing it for decades," replied Gainor. "Hollywood, the Left, the media, they hate the oil industry. They hate corporate America."
Gainor later added, "It's amazing how far the left will go just to stoop, to manipulate your kids, to convince them, to give [them] an anti-corporate message."
Bolling asked "Are there any Occupy Wallstreet Muppets?"
0 Views
08:32:58 01/30/12
VOTE - War crimes a public/citizen enquiry
[LESS INFO] 0 VIEWS | ADDED 08:32:58 01/30/12
War crimes a public/citizen enquiry This enquiry was held at Old Street Magistrates Court in London England, January 2012. The purpose of this enquiry was to identify the facts and to decide whether enough evidence exists in order to convict modern day war criminals. This enquiry was focusing on the Iraq war. After viewing the evidence that is held within this series of videos (which is quite lengthy) you will be able to make an informed choice. It is acknowledged that regarding the defense, a stronger case could have been put forward. By saying this statement, it is not advocating the stance of the defenses case in anyway But this should not distract one from the facts presented. The question is; Should Tony Blair and others face trial at the Old Bailey or The Hague for war crimes against the Iraqi people? You can submit your vote at the following link. http://visionon.tv The evidence from this trial, along with video evidence will be submitted to the ICC, the Metropolitan Police and the U.S embassy You tube link to a condensed discussion outlining the %aposlaws of war' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlVvIdHndeU Other video footage from the citizen/public enquiry http://grassroots.mirocommunity.org/video/6019/occupy-justice-holds-peoples-t http://grassroots.mirocommunity.org/video/6065/occupy-war-tribunal-sets-model Photographs from the event http://www.hughhillphotography.com/gallery/occupy-war-crimes-trial Further reading regarding the enquiry Occupy London War Crimes Tribunal invites you to.docx http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Occupy+London+War+Crimes+Tribunal+invite... The case for and against the prosecution: http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/The+case+for+and+against+the+prosecution... Was the Iraq war legal? http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Was+the+Iraq+War+Legal.pdf Extracts from UNGA http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Extracts+from+UNGA+RESOLUTION+2625+-+3.pdf Accounting for genocide: http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Accounting+for+Genocide+5.pdf For other information and action you can take, please see; http://peacestrike.org http://taxrebellion.org http://theoccupiedtimes.co.uk http://www.occupyforum.org.uk http://occupylsx.org http://www.bankofideas.org.uk
2 Views
02:32:00 01/30/12
VOTE - War crimes a public/citizen enquiry
[LESS INFO] 2 VIEWS | ADDED 02:32:00 01/30/12
War crimes a public/citizen enquiry This enquiry was held at Old Street Magistrates Court in London England, January 2012. The purpose of this enquiry was to identify the facts and to decide whether enough evidence exists in order to convict modern day war criminals. This enquiry was focusing on the Iraq war. After viewing the evidence that is held within this series of videos (which is quite lengthy) you will be able to make an informed choice. It is acknowledged that regarding the defense, a stronger case could have been put forward. By saying this statement, it is not advocating the stance of the defenses case in anyway But this should not distract one from the facts presented. The question is; Should Tony Blair and others face trial at the Old Bailey or The Hague for war crimes against the Iraqi people? You can submit your vote at the following link. http://visionon.tv The evidence from this trial, along with video evidence will be submitted to the ICC, the Metropolitan Police and the U.S embassy You tube link to a condensed discussion outlining the %oslaws of war%os http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlVvIdHndeU Other video footage from the citizen/public enquiry http://grassroots.mirocommunity.org/video/6019/occupy-justice-holds-peoples-t http://grassroots.mirocommunity.org/video/6065/occupy-war-tribunal-sets-model Photographs from the event http://www.hughhillphotography.com/gallery/occupy-war-crimes-trial Further reading regarding the enquiry Occupy London War Crimes Tribunal invites you to.docx http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Occupy+London+War+Crimes+Tribunal+invite... The case for and against the prosecution: http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/The+case+for+and+against+the+prosecution... Was the Iraq war legal? http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Was+the+Iraq+War+Legal.pdf Extracts from UNGA http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Extracts+from+UNGA+RESOLUTION+2625+-+3.pdf Accounting for genocide: http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Accounting+for+Genocide+5.pdf For other information and action you can take, please see; http://peacestrike.org http://taxrebellion.org http://theoccupiedtimes.co.uk http://www.occupyforum.org.uk http://occupylsx.org http://www.bankofideas.org.uk
2 Views
02:32:00 01/30/12
VOTE - War crimes a public/citizen enquiry
[LESS INFO] 2 VIEWS | ADDED 02:32:00 01/30/12
War crimes a public/citizen enquiry This enquiry was held at Old Street Magistrates Court in London England, January 2012. The purpose of this enquiry was to identify the facts and to decide whether enough evidence exists in order to convict modern day war criminals. This enquiry was focusing on the Iraq war. After viewing the evidence that is held within this series of videos (which is quite lengthy) you will be able to make an informed choice. It is acknowledged that regarding the defense, a stronger case could have been put forward. By saying this statement, it is not advocating the stance of the defenses case in anyway But this should not distract one from the facts presented. The question is; Should Tony Blair and others face trial at the Old Bailey or The Hague for war crimes against the Iraqi people? You can submit your vote at the following link. http://visionon.tv The evidence from this trial, along with video evidence will be submitted to the ICC, the Metropolitan Police and the U.S embassy You tube link to a condensed discussion outlining the %oslaws of war%os http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlVvIdHndeU Other video footage from the citizen/public enquiry http://grassroots.mirocommunity.org/video/6019/occupy-justice-holds-peoples-t http://grassroots.mirocommunity.org/video/6065/occupy-war-tribunal-sets-model Photographs from the event http://www.hughhillphotography.com/gallery/occupy-war-crimes-trial Further reading regarding the enquiry Occupy London War Crimes Tribunal invites you to.docx http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Occupy+London+War+Crimes+Tribunal+invite... The case for and against the prosecution: http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/The+case+for+and+against+the+prosecution... Was the Iraq war legal? http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Was+the+Iraq+War+Legal.pdf Extracts from UNGA http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Extracts+from+UNGA+RESOLUTION+2625+-+3.pdf Accounting for genocide: http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Accounting+for+Genocide+5.pdf For other information and action you can take, please see; http://peacestrike.org http://taxrebellion.org http://theoccupiedtimes.co.uk http://www.occupyforum.org.uk http://occupylsx.org http://www.bankofideas.org.uk
2 Views
02:32:00 01/30/12
VOTE - War crimes a public/citizen enquiry
[LESS INFO] 2 VIEWS | ADDED 02:32:00 01/30/12
War crimes a public/citizen enquiry This enquiry was held at Old Street Magistrates Court in London England, January 2012. The purpose of this enquiry was to identify the facts and to decide whether enough evidence exists in order to convict modern day war criminals. This enquiry was focusing on the Iraq war. After viewing the evidence that is held within this series of videos (which is quite lengthy) you will be able to make an informed choice. It is acknowledged that regarding the defense, a stronger case could have been put forward. By saying this statement, it is not advocating the stance of the defenses case in anyway But this should not distract one from the facts presented. The question is; Should Tony Blair and others face trial at the Old Bailey or The Hague for war crimes against the Iraqi people? You can submit your vote at the following link. http://visionon.tv The evidence from this trial, along with video evidence will be submitted to the ICC, the Metropolitan Police and the U.S embassy You tube link to a condensed discussion outlining the %oslaws of war%os http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlVvIdHndeU Other video footage from the citizen/public enquiry http://grassroots.mirocommunity.org/video/6019/occupy-justice-holds-peoples-t http://grassroots.mirocommunity.org/video/6065/occupy-war-tribunal-sets-model Photographs from the event http://www.hughhillphotography.com/gallery/occupy-war-crimes-trial Further reading regarding the enquiry Occupy London War Crimes Tribunal invites you to.docx http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Occupy+London+War+Crimes+Tribunal+invite... The case for and against the prosecution: http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/The+case+for+and+against+the+prosecution... Was the Iraq war legal? http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Was+the+Iraq+War+Legal.pdf Extracts from UNGA http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Extracts+from+UNGA+RESOLUTION+2625+-+3.pdf Accounting for genocide: http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Accounting+for+Genocide+5.pdf For other information and action you can take, please see; http://peacestrike.org http://taxrebellion.org http://theoccupiedtimes.co.uk http://www.occupyforum.org.uk http://occupylsx.org http://www.bankofideas.org.uk
1 Views
02:32:00 01/30/12
VOTE - War crimes a public/citizen enquiry
[LESS INFO] 1 VIEWS | ADDED 02:32:00 01/30/12
War crimes a public/citizen enquiry This enquiry was held at Old Street Magistrates Court in London England, January 2012. The purpose of this enquiry was to identify the facts and to decide whether enough evidence exists in order to convict modern day war criminals. This enquiry was focusing on the Iraq war. After viewing the evidence that is held within this series of videos (which is quite lengthy) you will be able to make an informed choice. It is acknowledged that regarding the defense, a stronger case could have been put forward. By saying this statement, it is not advocating the stance of the defenses case in anyway But this should not distract one from the facts presented. The question is; Should Tony Blair and others face trial at the Old Bailey or The Hague for war crimes against the Iraqi people? You can submit your vote at the following link. http://visionon.tv The evidence from this trial, along with video evidence will be submitted to the ICC, the Metropolitan Police and the U.S embassy You tube link to a condensed discussion outlining the %oslaws of war%os http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlVvIdHndeU Other video footage from the citizen/public enquiry http://grassroots.mirocommunity.org/video/6019/occupy-justice-holds-peoples-t http://grassroots.mirocommunity.org/video/6065/occupy-war-tribunal-sets-model Photographs from the event http://www.hughhillphotography.com/gallery/occupy-war-crimes-trial Further reading regarding the enquiry Occupy London War Crimes Tribunal invites you to.docx http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Occupy+London+War+Crimes+Tribunal+invite... The case for and against the prosecution: http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/The+case+for+and+against+the+prosecution... Was the Iraq war legal? http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Was+the+Iraq+War+Legal.pdf Extracts from UNGA http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Extracts+from+UNGA+RESOLUTION+2625+-+3.pdf Accounting for genocide: http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Accounting+for+Genocide+5.pdf For other information and action you can take, please see; http://peacestrike.org http://taxrebellion.org http://theoccupiedtimes.co.uk http://www.occupyforum.org.uk http://occupylsx.org http://www.bankofideas.org.uk
0 Views
21:00:11 01/29/12
Newt on This Week: Mitt Can't Tell The Truth, Has A 'Character' Problem
[LESS INFO] 0 VIEWS | ADDED 21:00:11 01/29/12
video platform video management video solutions video player
Now, I'm going to assume that you didn't come in during the third act of Newt's career, and therefore you can appreciate just how funny it is when, on This Week , he's whining to Jake Tapper about how hard it is to pin someone down who will just lie about anything ! >
TAPPER: In many ways, you are where you are because of your debate performances. Last week, you had a couple that were not your strongest, to say the least.
GINGRICH: Yep.
TAPPER: Why do you think that was? What happened?
GINGRICH: I was amazed. I mean, I'm standing next to a guy who is the most blatantly dishonest answers I can remember in any presidential race in -- in my lifetime. And I've seen, I think, every presidential debate -- presidential campaign debate or virtually every one. And, you know, he would say things that were just plain not true.
Look, it's a little bit like yesterday's L.A. Times report. I mean, now it found 23 foreign accounts he never reported until he released his taxes. He would say -- he would say thing after thing after thing that just plain wasn't true.
And I had -- I don't know how you debate a person with civility if they're prepared to say things that are just plain factually false. And that's going to become a key part of this. I think the Republican establishment believes it's OK to say and do virtually anything to stop a genuine insurgency from winning because they are very afraid of losing control of the old order.
We tried a moderate in 1996 for president. He lost. We tried a moderate in 2008 for president. He lost. It's very hard to take Romneycare and Obamacare and have a debate and have the Republican win that debate. You need to have a conservative who is a very big distance away from Obama, because you've got to have the space so that, in fact, you can communicate with the American people.
TAPPER: I want to follow up on some of these comments you're making about Mitt Romney. The race has taken something of a nasty turn. Here's an ad that you are currently running in Florida.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
(UNKNOWN): What kind of man would mislead, distort and deceive just to win an election? This man would, Mitt Romney. If we can't trust what Mitt Romney says about his own record, how can we trust him on anything?
(END VIDEO CLIP)
TAPPER: It sounds as if you're saying in that ad, and here this morning, that Mitt Romney is unfit and does not have the character to be president.
GINGRICH: I am saying that he would not be where he is today, the debates this week wouldn't have been where they were, if he had told the truth. And I think that's a very serious problem for somebody. I think that you look at -- again, he's supposedly a great manager, yet he can't explain 23 different foreign accounts that weren't reported. He's a great manager. He can't explain being on the board of directors of the company which got the largest Medicare fine in history for fraud?
Somehow, every time it's bad, he didn't know about it or he wasn't aware about it. He didn't really understand the Planned Parenthood by law, the largest abortion provider in the United States, is in Romneycare? Romneycare literally defines Planned Parenthood in a key -- in a part of the bill. He didn't seem to quite know it.
Every time you turn around, this great manager consistently doesn't understand whatever it is that would have hurt him. And you just have to look back and say, why can't you be candid with the American people? You cannot be president of the United States if you cannot be honest and candid with the American people. And that's compounded, frankly, by a number of the ads he runs, which are just plain false.
TAPPER: So you're saying that he does not have the character to be president of the United States, because he's, in your view, not honest.
GINGRICH: I'm saying it is a very -- it's a -- it is a very serious problem when you have somebody who on item after item after item -- I mean, the clip you had just now, he knows what he said in that clip is not true. I did not resign in disgrace. I did not pay a fine. And, in fact, CNN ran an entire piece recently in which they pointed out that on every single substantive count in the ethics investigation, every single one, that I was vindicated, including vindication by a federal judge, vindication by the Internal Revenue Service, vindication by the Federal Elections Commission . Now, Romney knows that.
(CROSSTALK)
TAPPER: Well, the clip -- the clip...
GINGRICH: So he's run a campaign of vilification.
TAPPER: The clip I just played was actually one of your ads, but let's get to that Romney ad that you're talking about...
GINGRICH: No, no, but I'm talking about the earlier -- I'm talking about -- I'm talking about the clip you showed of him campaigning yesterday.
TAPPER: Oh, OK.
GINGRICH: What he said yesterday, this wasn't true.
TAPPER: There...
GINGRICH: And so at some point, I don't quite -- I don't quite -- to be honest, Jake, I don't quite know how you deal with an opponent, because you want to deal with them with civility, you want to deal with them in a positive way. I want to talk about big issues.
I talked about space this week, which I think is important for the country's future. I talked about housing. I talked about creating jobs. I talked about the record I had working with Ronald Reagan to create jobs and the record I had working with Bill Clinton to create jobs. We talked about welfare reform as the first great entitlement reform.
There are all sorts of positive things. We have a proposal on Social Security which would allow every young American the option of having a personal Social Security account on the model of Galveston, Texas, and the country of Chile. So there are a lot of positive things.
And if you'll notice, when you get outside the zone where Romney carpet-bombs with Wall Street money, and you look at what's happening in the rest of the country, I'm ahead in all three national polls that were released this week. I'm ahead by a big margin, because when you come to positive ideas, I represent real change in Washington, I represent unleashing the spirit of the American people to get us back as a country, rebuilding the country we love. And when we get to a positive idea campaign, I consistently win.
It's only when he can mass money to focus on carpet-bombing with negative ads that he gains any traction at all.
0 Views
14:10:51 01/29/12
War crimes a public/citizen enquiry
[LESS INFO] 0 VIEWS | ADDED 14:10:51 01/29/12
War crimes a public/citizen enquiry This enquiry was held at Old Street Magistrates Court in London England, January 2012. The purpose of this enquiry was to identify the facts and to decide whether enough evidence exists in order to convict modern day war criminals. This enquiry was focusing on the Iraq war. After viewing the evidence that is held within this series of videos (which is quite lengthy) you will be able to make an informed choice. It is acknowledged that regarding the defense, a stronger case could have been put forward. By saying this statement, it is not advocating the stance of the defenses case in anyway But this should not distract one from the facts presented. The question is; Should Tony Blair and others face trial at the Old Bailey or The Hague for war crimes against the Iraqi people? You can submit your vote at the following link. http://visionon.tv The evidence from this trial, along with video evidence will be submitted to the ICC, the Metropolitan Police and the U.S embassy You tube link to a condensed discussion outlining the 'laws of war' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlVvIdHndeU Other video footage from the citizen/public enquiry http://grassroots.mirocommunity.org/video/6019/occupy-justice-holds-peoples-t http://grassroots.mirocommunity.org/video/6065/occupy-war-tribunal-sets-model Photographs from the event http://www.hughhillphotography.com/gallery/occupy-war-crimes-trial Further reading regarding the enquiry Occupy London War Crimes Tribunal invites you to.docx http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Occupy+London+War+Crimes+Tribunal+invite... The case for and against the prosecution: http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/The+case+for+and+against+the+prosecution... Was the Iraq war legal? http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Was+the+Iraq+War+Legal.pdf Extracts from UNGA http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Extracts+from+UNGA+RESOLUTION+2625+-+3.pdf Accounting for genocide: http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Accounting+for+Genocide+5.pdf For other information and action you can take, please see; http://peacestrike.org http://taxrebellion.org http://theoccupiedtimes.co.uk http://www.occupyforum.org.uk http://occupylsx.org http://www.bankofideas.org.uk
1 Views
08:10:00 01/29/12
War crimes a public/citizen enquiry
[LESS INFO] 1 VIEWS | ADDED 08:10:00 01/29/12
War crimes a public/citizen enquiry This enquiry was held at Old Street Magistrates Court in London England, January 2012. The purpose of this enquiry was to identify the facts and to decide whether enough evidence exists in order to convict modern day war criminals. This enquiry was focusing on the Iraq war. After viewing the evidence that is held within this series of videos (which is quite lengthy) you will be able to make an informed choice. It is acknowledged that regarding the defense, a stronger case could have been put forward. By saying this statement, it is not advocating the stance of the defenses case in anyway But this should not distract one from the facts presented. The question is; Should Tony Blair and others face trial at the Old Bailey or The Hague for war crimes against the Iraqi people? You can submit your vote at the following link. http://visionon.tv The evidence from this trial, along with video evidence will be submitted to the ICC, the Metropolitan Police and the U.S embassy You tube link to a condensed discussion outlining the %oslaws of war%os http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlVvIdHndeU Other video footage from the citizen/public enquiry http://grassroots.mirocommunity.org/video/6019/occupy-justice-holds-peoples-t http://grassroots.mirocommunity.org/video/6065/occupy-war-tribunal-sets-model Photographs from the event http://www.hughhillphotography.com/gallery/occupy-war-crimes-trial Further reading regarding the enquiry Occupy London War Crimes Tribunal invites you to.docx http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Occupy+London+War+Crimes+Tribunal+invite... The case for and against the prosecution: http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/The+case+for+and+against+the+prosecution... Was the Iraq war legal? http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Was+the+Iraq+War+Legal.pdf Extracts from UNGA http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Extracts+from+UNGA+RESOLUTION+2625+-+3.pdf Accounting for genocide: http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Accounting+for+Genocide+5.pdf For other information and action you can take, please see; http://peacestrike.org http://taxrebellion.org http://theoccupiedtimes.co.uk http://www.occupyforum.org.uk http://occupylsx.org http://www.bankofideas.org.uk
2 Views
08:10:00 01/29/12
War crimes a public/citizen enquiry
[LESS INFO] 2 VIEWS | ADDED 08:10:00 01/29/12
War crimes a public/citizen enquiry This enquiry was held at Old Street Magistrates Court in London England, January 2012. The purpose of this enquiry was to identify the facts and to decide whether enough evidence exists in order to convict modern day war criminals. This enquiry was focusing on the Iraq war. After viewing the evidence that is held within this series of videos (which is quite lengthy) you will be able to make an informed choice. It is acknowledged that regarding the defense, a stronger case could have been put forward. By saying this statement, it is not advocating the stance of the defenses case in anyway But this should not distract one from the facts presented. The question is; Should Tony Blair and others face trial at the Old Bailey or The Hague for war crimes against the Iraqi people? You can submit your vote at the following link. http://visionon.tv The evidence from this trial, along with video evidence will be submitted to the ICC, the Metropolitan Police and the U.S embassy You tube link to a condensed discussion outlining the %oslaws of war%os http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlVvIdHndeU Other video footage from the citizen/public enquiry http://grassroots.mirocommunity.org/video/6019/occupy-justice-holds-peoples-t http://grassroots.mirocommunity.org/video/6065/occupy-war-tribunal-sets-model Photographs from the event http://www.hughhillphotography.com/gallery/occupy-war-crimes-trial Further reading regarding the enquiry Occupy London War Crimes Tribunal invites you to.docx http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Occupy+London+War+Crimes+Tribunal+invite... The case for and against the prosecution: http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/The+case+for+and+against+the+prosecution... Was the Iraq war legal? http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Was+the+Iraq+War+Legal.pdf Extracts from UNGA http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Extracts+from+UNGA+RESOLUTION+2625+-+3.pdf Accounting for genocide: http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Accounting+for+Genocide+5.pdf For other information and action you can take, please see; http://peacestrike.org http://taxrebellion.org http://theoccupiedtimes.co.uk http://www.occupyforum.org.uk http://occupylsx.org http://www.bankofideas.org.uk
1 Views
08:10:00 01/29/12
War crimes a public/citizen enquiry
[LESS INFO] 1 VIEWS | ADDED 08:10:00 01/29/12
War crimes a public/citizen enquiry This enquiry was held at Old Street Magistrates Court in London England, January 2012. The purpose of this enquiry was to identify the facts and to decide whether enough evidence exists in order to convict modern day war criminals. This enquiry was focusing on the Iraq war. After viewing the evidence that is held within this series of videos (which is quite lengthy) you will be able to make an informed choice. It is acknowledged that regarding the defense, a stronger case could have been put forward. By saying this statement, it is not advocating the stance of the defenses case in anyway But this should not distract one from the facts presented. The question is; Should Tony Blair and others face trial at the Old Bailey or The Hague for war crimes against the Iraqi people? You can submit your vote at the following link. http://visionon.tv The evidence from this trial, along with video evidence will be submitted to the ICC, the Metropolitan Police and the U.S embassy You tube link to a condensed discussion outlining the %oslaws of war%os http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlVvIdHndeU Other video footage from the citizen/public enquiry http://grassroots.mirocommunity.org/video/6019/occupy-justice-holds-peoples-t http://grassroots.mirocommunity.org/video/6065/occupy-war-tribunal-sets-model Photographs from the event http://www.hughhillphotography.com/gallery/occupy-war-crimes-trial Further reading regarding the enquiry Occupy London War Crimes Tribunal invites you to.docx http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Occupy+London+War+Crimes+Tribunal+invite... The case for and against the prosecution: http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/The+case+for+and+against+the+prosecution... Was the Iraq war legal? http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Was+the+Iraq+War+Legal.pdf Extracts from UNGA http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Extracts+from+UNGA+RESOLUTION+2625+-+3.pdf Accounting for genocide: http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Accounting+for+Genocide+5.pdf For other information and action you can take, please see; http://peacestrike.org http://taxrebellion.org http://theoccupiedtimes.co.uk http://www.occupyforum.org.uk http://occupylsx.org http://www.bankofideas.org.uk
1 Views
08:10:00 01/29/12
War crimes a public/citizen enquiry
[LESS INFO] 1 VIEWS | ADDED 08:10:00 01/29/12
War crimes a public/citizen enquiry This enquiry was held at Old Street Magistrates Court in London England, January 2012. The purpose of this enquiry was to identify the facts and to decide whether enough evidence exists in order to convict modern day war criminals. This enquiry was focusing on the Iraq war. After viewing the evidence that is held within this series of videos (which is quite lengthy) you will be able to make an informed choice. It is acknowledged that regarding the defense, a stronger case could have been put forward. By saying this statement, it is not advocating the stance of the defenses case in anyway But this should not distract one from the facts presented. The question is; Should Tony Blair and others face trial at the Old Bailey or The Hague for war crimes against the Iraqi people? You can submit your vote at the following link. http://visionon.tv The evidence from this trial, along with video evidence will be submitted to the ICC, the Metropolitan Police and the U.S embassy You tube link to a condensed discussion outlining the %oslaws of war%os http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlVvIdHndeU Other video footage from the citizen/public enquiry http://grassroots.mirocommunity.org/video/6019/occupy-justice-holds-peoples-t http://grassroots.mirocommunity.org/video/6065/occupy-war-tribunal-sets-model Photographs from the event http://www.hughhillphotography.com/gallery/occupy-war-crimes-trial Further reading regarding the enquiry Occupy London War Crimes Tribunal invites you to.docx http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Occupy+London+War+Crimes+Tribunal+invite... The case for and against the prosecution: http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/The+case+for+and+against+the+prosecution... Was the Iraq war legal? http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Was+the+Iraq+War+Legal.pdf Extracts from UNGA http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Extracts+from+UNGA+RESOLUTION+2625+-+3.pdf Accounting for genocide: http://visionon.tv/documents/10156/0/Accounting+for+Genocide+5.pdf For other information and action you can take, please see; http://peacestrike.org http://taxrebellion.org http://theoccupiedtimes.co.uk http://www.occupyforum.org.uk http://occupylsx.org http://www.bankofideas.org.uk
