Video Episodes:
7 Views
12:18:23 08/31/09
SYNCHED OUT
[LESS INFO] 7 VIEWS | ADDED 16:18:23 08/31/09
SYNCHED OUT
These are the first 11 minutes of the September 11, 2001 LIVE TV BROADCASTS. The five major US TV networks (ABC, CBS, FOX, NBS and CNN) are synchronized - visually - using cues from apparent, shared 'satellite feeds' seen in the various broadcasts. In spite of this, several inexplicable synch offsets occur randomly - at various times of the broadcasts. A host of aberrations suggest that these 'LIVE broadcasts' simply cannot be real: artificial, saturated, monochromatic color schemes; unrealistic camera motions; numerous/aimless chopper fly-bys; one single, surreal bird-flock fly-by, etc. One must wonder what those many 'choppers' are up to in the first place: most simply fly across the screen at sustained speed. Some are synched (between the networks), while some are not - or altogether missing. All of this suggests these images are merely a pre-fabricated batch of computer simulations designed to fool the world.
Keep in mind that these broadcasts should represent the immediate aftermath of a most unexpected event (the 1st “hijacked plane’s” strike at 8:46AM). Yet, the 5 rival TV networks appear to be instantly interconnected – often sharing identical images in real-time, as if all were actually mixed in a single TV studio. A series of other oddities occur in these crucial minutes of the day's 'newscasts. I have chosen to point out only a few significant ones – leaving the opportunity for anyone to pick out the rest. Test your observation skills !
What best reveals the contrived nature of these proffered “LIVE” broadcasts are the final 16 secs of the “plane approach” sequence: four shots depict the approach sequentially - yet none of the 4 shots timelines overlap. It ensues that there are no two directly comparable LIVE SHOTS within the “airplane approach” timeline. This is - objectively speaking - way beyond the realm of probability; To put down such an occurence to haphazard demands a formidable 'leap of faith'. (To be sure, the official tale of 9/11 presents an endless procession of extraordinary ‘coincidences’). More likely, this ocurrence was no fluke : disallowing any comparison/cross-examination of the 4 "airplane shots" would have been an obvious 'safety measure' observed by the computer-animation crew.
3 Views
02:39:02 08/21/09
FLY-OVER SOUND BOEING
[LESS INFO] 3 VIEWS | ADDED 06:39:02 08/21/09
What alleged "Flight11" should have sounded like - as it flew all across the full length of Manhattan on September 11, 2001.
21 Views
09:13:29 03/24/09
SEPTEMBER CLUES addendum CHAPTER 1
[LESS INFO] 21 VIEWS | ADDED 13:13:29 03/24/09
No videos of 9/11 can be trusted. Not even the tower collapses.
Here is the proof.
Various techniques were used to sell the events on 9/11 with fake (or real but manipulated) computer-generated imagery.
Before you comment on this latest study, ask yourself one simple question :
Would it have been wise for the 9/11 planners to rig explosives (or use any sort of weaponry) to bring down the WTC towers - and let anyone FILM the event with all its unpredictable variables ? Would they not ensure that the DEPICTION of this very risky demolition-job be kept away from anyone's scrutiny?
In any event, it should be clear that the various videos betray irreconcilable discrepancies. It is up to everyone's logic to make sense out of the imagery we were fed on 9/11 by the major TV networks.
For more info & updates about this ongoing research, please go to :
http://forum.911movement.org/index.ph...
I post at that forum under the name 'socialservice'
Thanks for your interest and participation !
9 Views
08:46:57 01/12/09
WTC7 STUDY
[LESS INFO] 9 VIEWS | ADDED 13:46:57 01/12/09
WTC7 STUDY
My analysis of the available WTC7 footage of 9/11.
Much as the 9/11 airplane images were doctored / or entirely computerized (see 'SEPTEMBER CLUES'), the various footage showing the WTC7 collapse betrays irreconcilable discrepancies. While some early TV shots may have been simply retouched ( to blur & conceal the explosiveness of the WTC7's demise ), other subsequently released clips appear to be entirely fabricated imagery (digital video composites).
Other manipulations such as digital inserts of fiery smokeplumes (see at 1:11 and 2:45 of this study) were likely deemed necessary for added credibility as to the purported "weakening by large fires" of the WTC7 structure. It is worth reminding that as many as 7 buildings ( the entire WTC Complex, in fact ) were terminally damaged - and scores of vehicles in the area were charred / melted. All this, we are asked to believe, was caused by falling Twin Tower debris... To determine just what sort of conventional / non-conventional weaponry caused this mayhem is not within my field of research and competence - although I surmise all kinds were employed.
The findings of this study should make it clear that image manipulations had a central & primary role within the 9/11 false-flag operation. The ideal layout of Lower Manhattan facilitated its comprehensive evacuation, keeping firsthand witnesses to a minimum . Any privately-filmed footage would have been impeded by electronic jamming devices, commonly used in modern war zones.
http://www.sew-lexicon.com/gloss_e.htm#ELECTRONIC_WARFARE
Just about every single 9/11 researcher has been accused of deliberately misleading the 'people's' (for lack of any other) genuine 9/11 investigation. I have not escaped from such claims and can only hope everyone will carefully evaluate for him / herself whether or not my ongoing research is sincere, logical and ultimately correct.
simon shack
6 Views
12:16:38 09/18/08
SEPTEMBER CLUES (NEW) second half
[LESS INFO] 6 VIEWS | ADDED 16:16:38 09/18/08
The NEW 2008 version of
SEPTEMBER CLUES.
You may download hi-quality versions here : http://www.thesocialservice.it
The myriad of theories surrounding 9/11 have served the perpetrators well for over 7 years, giving the false impression freedom of speech was alive and well but ultimately spreading an almost mindnumbing confusion.
Most "911truth" organizations are run by the same people who organised this sham. This in order to 'control' the opposition, for as long as possible, in the hope it would all fade away one day in the public consciousness.
As most theories have built on the false assumption that airplanes were involved, the 'plane' myth has held strong - in spite of the widespread understanding no airliners crashed at the Pentagon or in Shanksville.
The misheld belief that 'thousands of Newyorkers' saw passenger planes crash into the twin towers is upheld solely by the relentless pounding of the mainstream media, the higher levels of which have complied to the requirements of this military false-flag operation.
Virtually all firsthand witnesses to the first "plane" were newspeople as shown in SEPTEMBER CLUES part D. As for the second "plane", MOST witnesses on the street reported 'a SMALL PLANE' or even 'A MISSILE' . These reports were actually aired on the day but never again. Of course, a plane-shaped cruise missile with wings and tail section (such as a JASSM cruise missile) would be perceived as a 'small plane' to most people : in fact, a study of 12000 pages of testimonies has determined that the majority of eyewitnesses reported a small aircraft - NOT a large airliner.
In SEPTEMBER CLUES part F we see that the alleged authors of the "amateur" videos ALSO were people linked to the newsmedia / film and video industry. All of those clips are, by now, proven forgeries : Many turn out to be simply cropped duplicates of the same composite, while most disqualify each other by the way of unconcilable differences : trajectories, angles, pitch, yaw, speeds, lighting, hues - to name a few. The few clips showing the actual 'plane' penetration depict a wide body (aluminum) airliner penetrating the steel-frame tower effortlessly without even the brittle tail section breaking off. This is of course utterly absurd and makes a joke of the laws of physics.
The current reluctance of most people to recognize and accept this research is - in many ways - understandable, the foremost cause being the massive conditioning power of the mainstream newsmedia.
However, the many mistakes made by the authors of these crude fabrications (which included digital simulations of the Manhattan landscape) will not stand the test of time. This branch of 9/11 truth research is naturally being vigorously attacked and billed as "disinformation" - as it contains the only tangible and repeatable proof of this murderous hoax : with no rubble to analyze and only speculation to go on , no one is going to prove HOW 3 towers collapsed nor IF or WHY a Norad standdown was ordered. On the other hand, the evidence of TV fakery cannot be suppressed no matter how hard the perpetrators may try.
9 Views
08:44:38 09/18/08
SEPTEMBER CLUES (NEW) first half
[LESS INFO] 9 VIEWS | ADDED 12:44:38 09/18/08
The NEW 2008 version of
SEPTEMBER CLUES. http://www.septemberclues.info On 9/11, the US TV networks used computer generated sceneries of Manhattan. Multiple techniques of image manipulation were employed to simulate "airplanes crashing into the World Trade Center". We now have conclusive evidence that the TV networks were proactively complicit in staging this false-flag operation needed to gather public consensus to wage immensely profitable, illegal wars.
The forensic analysis of the live images leave no room for doubt : they do not depict the real-life events of the day but turn out to be entirely doctored video sequences which effectively fooled the worldwide TV audience. Thus, the live broadcasts now stored in the major TV networks' archives, constitute the most solid, verifiable and repeatable proof to expose the falseness of the official version of the 9/11 tragedy.
The subsequently released, so-called "amateur" videos were more sophisticated video composites yet all have now been exposed for what they are :digital forgeries. Most likely, electromagnetic technology commonly used in war zones (to jam electronic circuitries) prevented any private footage being recorded at the time of the tower strikes. Scores of testimonies confirm that cellphones or firefighters' walkie-talkies did not function properly in NYC that day.
Most on-the-scene witnesses reported a SMALL aircraft of some sort : Arguably, what they saw was a winged missile. The 4 purported hijacked flights, as well as the related passenger lists, turn out to have several problems as far as their authenticity is concerned : a long list of documentation (or lack of it) reveal serious discrepancies regarding NTSB, BTS and FAA data. All of the above facts, taken together, suggest that the official version of the events is fraudulent.